Nightly session brief β€” Bankroll Truth Serum (Aug 30)

arxiv-scrape • 2026-08-30

TL;DR

Ran the full arxiv-scrape nightly playbook autonomously, start to finish, no

recovery needed. Fetched 176 fresh papers, ideated 24 ideas, ran a genuine 3-way

build-off with headless-browser verification on all three demos, and shipped the

winner β€” Bankroll Truth Serum, a live utility-based-acceptability-index

leaderboard β€” to share.djiang.xyz.

What I was asked to do

Execute the arxiv-scrape nightly scout playbook: fetch fresh papers, ideate

project/startup/youtube/demo ideas, pick a forum top-3 (with at least one

buildable-tonight demo), run a 3-way build-off + judge, publish the winner to

share.djiang.xyz via the manifest-driven site, and log the run.

What I attempted

1. Fetch: python3 fetch_papers.py 8 726 papers_nightly.json (day-of-year

242 Γ— 3). First attempt timed out at the 2-minute default; reran with a longer

timeout and it completed cleanly β€” 176 papers across 22 categories.

2. Sample + dedup: sampled 30 fresh papers, explicitly excluding every arXiv

ID that appeared in the last 4 nights' ideation runs (94 IDs checked) β€” 0

overlap in the final sample.

3. Ideation: ran a 6-batch parallel Workflow scoring each idea on

cool/buildable/discussion. votes.json (forum vote signal) is still all-zero

after a week of voting, so no tag bias was applied this run.

4. Forum top-3 selection: six ideas tied at discussion=9. Filtered to the

three highest on coolΓ—buildable that were also demo-type (the two startup

ideas tied at 9 β€” Pareto Edge Engine, SplitWatch β€” scored low on buildable-

tonight and were passed over for the build-off, but kept in the brief).

5. Build-off: spawned three independent builder subagents in parallel, one

per paper, each producing a single self-contained HTML demo with CDN libs

allowed. All three finished and each ran its own verification pass (Playwright

or Puppeteer headless-browser checks) β€” and each caught and fixed a real bug

during that verification (see below).

6. Judge: one subagent scored all three on wow/interactivity/polish/fidelity.

What succeeded

  • Fetch + ideation: papers_nightly.json (176 papers), ideation_2026-08-30_results.json

    • (24 ideas), committed to the arxiv-scrape repo.

  • digest_2026-08-30.json: written and validated (validate_digest.py) for

    • Sage's forum posting step β€” 3 papers, all required fields, demo fields pointing

    at the build-off winner.

  • Three working demos, all headless-verified:

    • - A β€” Order Flow Whisperer (arXiv:2307.15599): a market maker quotes

    bid/ask depth against a jump-diffusion price; an "informedness" slider

    controls prediction accuracy on the next jump, and that informed skew *is*

    the order-book imbalance. Playwright confirmed RΒ² climbs from ~0.02–0.07

    (noise) at informedness 0 to 0.38–0.82 at informedness 1. Caught a real bug:

    the "wrong guess" fallback matched the true jump direction by chance 50% of

    the time, inflating the noise floor β€” fixed with a forced sign-flip.

    - B β€” Predictable, You Are Not (arXiv:2607.20818): three sequential-

    sampling rules (i.i.d., naive greedy, self-balancing) race side by side on a

    configurable K-sided die, each tracking convergence speed and a live

    "guess-the-due-option" predictability exploit. Playwright-verified across

    every control with zero console errors; confirmed self-balancing matches

    greedy's convergence speed while staying near i.i.d.'s predictability floor.

    - C β€” Bankroll Truth Serum (arXiv:2310.02014) β€” the winner: four

    illustrative return streams (steady, high-vol, fat-tail, moderate) plotted as

    live bankroll paths; a CRRA risk-aversion slider recomputes real

    certainty-equivalent growth rates and re-ranks an animated leaderboard live.

    At Ξ³=0 the high-variance strategy is #1 on raw EV; by Ξ³=10 it's dead last

    with a negative CE. Puppeteer-verified, including a real mobile

    responsive-layout bug (leaderboard clipping at 420px) caught and fixed.

  • Judge verdict: B and C tied at 34/40 (A scored 31/40, no disqualifications).

    • C won the tie-break β€” "the interaction directly *is* the paper's result": one

    slider drag visibly reorders four strategies via a correct closed-form CRRA

    calculation, versus B's more abstract dual-chart tradeoff that needs two charts

    read together to land the payoff.

  • Published: demo + brief both written to david-share/arxiv-scrape/,

    • registered in manifest.json, committed and pushed

    (xpoes123/david-share@ff5d004). Live at

    https://share.djiang.xyz/arxiv-scrape/2026-08-30-nightly.html

  • Logged: full run recorded in arxiv-scrape/LOG_nightly.md, committed and

    • pushed (xpoes123/arxiv-scrape@ca22a87).

    What failed or is incomplete

    Nothing failed. The only hiccup was the fetch step's first attempt hitting the

    default 2-minute Bash timeout β€” not a bug, just needed a longer timeout on retry,

    and it produced identical output since arXiv's API state hadn't changed.

    Current state

    Everything is committed and pushed on main in both repos β€” no open branches, no

    uncommitted work. digest_2026-08-30.json is sitting ready for nightly.sh to

    pick up and post to the SharpLab forum (that step wasn't run by me β€” it's

    Sage's job per the playbook).

    Known issues / untested paths

  • Demo A and B were verified with headless-browser tooling improvised inside

    • each builder's sandbox (Playwright/Puppeteer installed ad hoc) rather than a

    standing test harness β€” reproducible, but not wired into CI.

  • The VPS-side git -C /opt/share pull that makes the push actually live on

    • share.djiang.xyz was not run by me (per the playbook, the nightly does

    not SSH to prod) β€” that happens via a separate deploy path.

  • votes.json is still all-zero after a week; the tag-bias mechanism in the

    • ideation step is implemented but has never actually been exercised with real

    signal yet.

    Recommendations

    1. If share.djiang.xyz doesn't show tonight's brief yet, it's waiting on the

    separate VPS pull step, not a bug here.

    2. Once forum voting produces some non-zero votes.json signal, worth checking

    that the tag-bias logic in the ideation batches actually shifts idea

    selection the way it's supposed to.

    3. Nothing urgent β€” this was a clean, uneventful run.