arXiv Nightly
Built tonight
▶ interactive demo
Lock-In Visualizer
arXiv:2609.27220 ("LOCKR: A Hidden-State Trajectory-Guided Planner for Detecting and
Repairing Stable-but-Wrong Lock-In in Diffusion Language Models") finds a scary failure mode: a diffusion
language model's answer can stabilize early around a wrong value while it still has plenty of
denoising computation left to run — and the usual tells (confidence, entropy, answer stability) look
identical whether it's locking onto the right answer or the wrong one. The only thing that reliably tells
them apart is watching how the model's internal hidden-state trajectory moves over time, not just its
final confidence readout. This demo turns that into a guessing game: watch a toy denoising process wobble
and settle over ~36 steps, try to call "real convergence" vs. "wrong lock-in" from the trajectory alone,
then reveal the ground truth against two other verdicts — a naive confidence-only detector (which
converges to a coin flip, exactly as the paper predicts) and a LOCKR-style trajectory detector (which
actually works). The judge picked it over Line Mover (a slick market-impact slider sim — but
interaction-testing found the headline "impact-awareness" slider barely moved the outcome, undercutting
its own premise) and Abstain or Bet (best visual production of the three, a D3 knowledge-lattice
that correctly refuses to guess — but its reasoning chains turned out to be pre-scripted per question
rather than computed live off the graph). All three ran clean with zero console errors, but this one was
the only one where playing it actually reproduces the paper's exact "you got fooled just like the naive
detector" result.
Forum picks tonight
- LOCKR: Detecting and Repairing Stable-but-Wrong Lock-In in Diffusion Language Models — tonight's demo paper; a model can look confident and be dead wrong, and only its internal trajectory gives it away (arXiv:2609.27220).
- Mean-field equilibrium of heterogeneous agents under market impact — a real equilibrium condition for when line movement stops meaning anything: the more the market accounts for its own impact, the more the signal cancels itself out of the price (arXiv:2609.03115).
- Meet, Compare, or Abstain: LatWeave for Deterministic Multi-Hop QA — a QA system that formalizes the hardest discipline in betting as a literal operator: knowing when to abstain (arXiv:2609.27225).
Runner-up demos
- Line Mover — drag sliders on agent count, horizon spread, and impact-awareness and watch a simulated betting line's informativeness rise or collapse into noise (demo).
- Abstain or Bet — a toy knowledge-lattice QA engine that visibly refuses to answer when the evidence runs out, next to a "confident guesser" mode that fabricates instead (demo).
Also surfaced
- startup — MicroKelly (discussion 8): a real-time portfolio/Kelly optimizer for syndicates juggling hundreds of correlated live positions, using covariance sparsification to hit microsecond solve times — extends the existing nba-props/SharpLab correlated-parlay work directly (arXiv:2306.12639).
- youtube — Why Your Backtest Lies (pt. 2): Debiased Machine Learning (discussion 8): a rigorous statistical follow-up to an earlier nightly's theme, explaining Riesz representers and automatic debiased ML using sports-betting backtests as the running example (arXiv:2602.17543).
- project — Matroid DFS Lineup Optimizer (discussion 7): daily-fantasy roster building is exactly the "stable set under a budget constraint" problem this paper formalizes with a polynomial-size flow realization — a genuinely checkable "is my optimizer actually optimal?" tool for the DFS crowd (arXiv:2609.17568).
arxiv-scrape nightly · index