A toy limit-order-book market — zero-intelligence traders + momentum/panic feedback. Break it with a fat-finger sell, then watch how price limits vs. circuit breakers handle the fallout.
Mizuta & Yagi build an agent-based artificial stock market to compare two crash-brakes: a price limit (a hard band the price cannot cross) and a circuit breaker (a full trading halt once price crosses a threshold).
With the price limit, sell orders that hit the lower bound just sit there instead of executing. If the band shifts (resets) before those orders get cancelled, more sell orders pile up at the new bound too — several stacked "walls" of unfilled sell size that block buy orders from clearing the floor, stalling the recovery. A circuit breaker sidesteps this: it simply pauses matching, so nothing gets artificially glued to one price.
Caveat straight from the abstract: the authors say circuit-breaker-over-price-limit only "should be adapted... in cases where the reason for falling prices is erroneous orders and when individual stocks are regulated" — not a universal claim. This demo's Fat-finger button models that erroneous-order case; Panic cascade models organic momentum selling, a case the paper doesn't claim the same verdict for.