Quantum vs. Classical Kelly: the Adaptive Measurement Bankroll Race

A stream of spin-½ particles is all prepared in one hidden polarization direction θtrue. Two gamblers measure each particle and bet double-or-nothing on the outcome, sizing bets with the Kelly criterion (f* = 2p − 1). The classical gambler always measures along a fixed axis and estimates p from empirical frequency. The quantum gambler keeps a Bayesian posterior over θtrue and rotates its measurement axis every round to the axis that best matches its current belief — exactly the "progressively adjusted measurement direction" from the paper. Probabilities obey the real Born rule for a spin-½ state: P(match) = cos²((θtrue − θmeas)/2). Drag the sliders and hit Run — the quantum curve pulls ahead because adaptive bases extract more information per particle.