You're seven-handed at the final table, negotiating an ICM chop (or a staking deal split).
Most of the table is reasonable — people offer roughly their fair share and don't quibble over
small slights. But a few players are carrying a grudge: they low-ball anyone they consider an
"outsider," and they'll torch a split out of spite rather than let an outsider profit from it.
Drag the slider below to change how many players at the table are holding a grudge, and
watch what the whole table's negotiating norm does in response. For a while, almost nothing
happens — the table stays fair. Then, past a critical fraction, it doesn't drift — it snaps.
Modeling the result of
"Prejudice driven spite: A discontinuous phase transition in ultimatum
game" —
arXiv:2510.18889.
The paper shows a population mixing prejudiced and unprejudiced ultimatum-game players does not
drift smoothly toward unfairness as the prejudiced fraction rises — it holds a "fair" equilibrium
(generous offers, low rejection) until a critical fraction, then jumps discontinuously to a
"spiteful" one (stingy offers, high rejection), with no stable in-between. This demo reproduces
that qualitative result with real generation-by-generation replicator dynamics. The slider's
fraction is locked into always playing "spite" (stingy offer, a rejection threshold that gets
more demanding the more grudge-holding peers back it up). Everyone else is free, and every
generation they actually play a round of real ultimatum games against randomly matched
opponents; next generation's free-player mix is drawn by real fitness-proportionate selection
on those payoffs. Fitness includes two legitimate extra terms beyond the raw pot split — a
majority/conformity bonus for matching the table's current dominant strategy, and a "spite
satisfaction" payoff a grudge-holder earns for successfully rejecting a lowball, which grows
with the grudge-holder fraction. Together those two terms turn this into a textbook fold
bifurcation: "everyone fair" is the only stable state at low fractions, and past a critical
fraction it loses stability outright, so the table collapses to "everyone spiteful" within a
few dozen generations — a real discontinuous jump produced by the dynamics, not a displayed
number switched by an if-statement.