The Market โ€” Sharpest Bettors & Mispriced Players

NSBA4's internal prediction market ยท Weeks 1โ€“5 ยท built 2026-07-21

โ€น Back to the Stat Pack hub

The one-paragraph version

The league runs its own play-money prediction market โ€” GMs and players betting on their own season. It gives us three things nobody else has: a ranking of who forecasts best, a read on which players are priced wrong, and hard proof of how random this league is. The headline: a room full of bettors with money on the line couldn't beat a coin flip on individual games โ€” but the sharpest few, betting early, genuinely beat the line.

SOLID safe to state as factCOLOR directional โ€” frame as funTINY n say the sample out loud

PRIMER ยท HOW THIS MARKET WORKS

Read this before the numbers make sense

"Volume" in the tables below is ฮฃ|cost| across trades, not a share count. Bot/strategy accounts (Bayes, Galton, Kelly, Pascal, Treasury, Tversky, results-bot) are excluded โ€” this is a human leaderboard.

SEGMENT 1 ยท THE NATE SILVER OF THE POOL

Sharpest bettor โ€” and the trap in the top line

Sorted by Brier (accuracy). The crown belongs to the robust forecaster with a real book behind the number โ€” so we gate the leaderboard at โ‰ฅ20 resolved markets. Thinner books are shown separately, because a great Brier on a dozen near-locks isn't the same skill.

โญ The robust leaderboard โ€” 20+ resolved markets

#TraderBrierMktsROINet worth
1dannyridel0.09444+13.7%4,298
2bonky0.09736+2.5%1,492
3xpoes0.09937+10.6%2,139
4pine0.15035+24.7%5,035
5HellCat0.15531+18.4%997
6kit kat0.17230+58.8%1,013
7draoethar0.18622โˆ’0.3%572
8dannyridel4 alt?0.19236+39.6%1,236
9blue water0.20829+43.8%1,650
10< so what? >0.21148+29.2%4,163
Sayโญ "Our sharpest forecaster with a real book behind it is dannyridel โ€” a 0.094 Brier across 44 resolved markets, the deepest sample in the pool, and he's second in net worth too. That's the closest thing this league has to a Nate Silver."

The thin-book leaderboard โ€” under 20 markets TINY n

Great Briers live up here too, but on tiny samples โ€” a couple of near-certain bets will do it. Read the market count out loud.

TraderBrierMktsROINet worth
a new rag0.06819+16.1%โˆ’605 (last)
abacus140.09315+20.1%2,162
Sid_S0.11712โˆ’7.3%571
Sohil0.12417+21.3%1,503
EN2K0.13514โˆ’5.1%653
usck0.15417โˆ’9.4%486
shamp00.15417+27.4%1,315
Varnite alt?0.19812โˆ’15.6%171
metavaria0.21118โˆ’22.9%404
sellmeperson0.2288+38.9%837
preY3RK0.25610โˆ’15.9%442
Nithin0.25711โˆ’14.2%662
isaacnewtonfanboy0.27712โˆ’62.2%152
lucida0.3869โˆ’44.1%681
Sayโญ "The lowest Brier in the whole pool โ€” 0.068 โ€” belongs to 'a new rag.' But it's on just 19 markets, and here's the kicker: he's dead last in net worth, minus 605 units. Our most accurate forecaster is somehow the pool's poorest trader. Forecasting and making money are two different sports."

Money, not accuracy

De-dupe note: dannyridel4 is almost certainly the same human as dannyridel; Varnite/varnite and blue water/bluewater16 are likely alts too. They're flagged, not merged โ€” if the crown-holder is double-listed, treat the alt as the same person.

SEGMENT 2 ยท WHO THE MARKET GOT WRONG

Most over- and underrated players

Take the market's implied ranking (from live LMSR prices) and lay it next to where each player actually sits after five weeks of real buzz data. The gaps are the story. SOLID (framing is ordinal โ€” prices vs. actual rank)

โญ Overrated โ€” the market's favorites who aren't

PlayerMarket saidActuallySubject
Eric L#1 fav (31%)#4Biology
Sohil R#1 fav (31%)#3Math
Rohan G#1 fav (16%)#4Comp Sci
Rahib H#2 fav (29%)#4Earth/Space
Sayโญ "The pool made Eric L the outright favorite to lead Biology scoring โ€” priced him #1. Five weeks in, he's actually fourth. Same exact story with Sohil R in math: the market's #1, really #3. The room fell in love with reputations."

โญ Underrated โ€” the market slept on them

PlayerMarket saidActuallySubject / stat
Angelina Y#2 (27%)#1 (36 pts)Top scorer โ€” Biology
Edwin H#2 (21%)#1 (9 negs)Most negs
Ishaan K#3 (9%)#2 (9 negs)Most negs
Say "While the pool argued over Eric L, Angelina Y quietly went out and led Biology outright โ€” 36 points โ€” and the market had her second the whole time."

Where the market actually nailed it โ€” the 32+ props

Eleven "will player X score 32+ in a game?" markets. The pool gave exactly one player a real shot โ€” Kian D at 93% โ€” and he dropped 44. It priced the other ten longshots at 7โ€“32%, and none of them cleared 32 all season. Perfect read. SOLID

Say "Give the market credit where it's due โ€” on the 32-point props, it went a clean 11-for-11. It backed Kian and faded everyone else, and every single one came in."
SEGMENT 3 ยท THE HARD PROOF

The market can't call a single game

This is the load-bearing result of the whole segment. Across 60 resolved game markets (moneylines + totals), the pregame line was right exactly 50% of the time โ€” a literal coin flip. Even on the 16 games where it had a real favorite (โ‰ฅ55%), it went just 38%. SOLID

Sayโญ "A room full of people betting real stakes, on their own league, could not beat a coin flip on individual games. Fifty percent on sixty games. That's not a knock on the bettors โ€” that's the hardest proof we have that this league is genuinely wide open."

Method note: by lock, live trading dragged the favorite to a median ~72% โ€” but that's the result leaking into the price in real time, not a forecast. These numbers use the pregame line, before tip.

โญ So the "upsets" aren't upsets โ€” reframe them

The market's four "biggest misses" were all 59โ€“61% pregame favorites that lost. A 60% favorite is supposed to lose about 40% of the time. These are coinflips landing on the underdog โ€” soft lines, not shocking upsets. Call them that on air.

GameMarket favoredWon"Upset"?
Fez_Keyreb vs GidTheKid2GidTheKid2 (61%)Fez_Keyrebcoinflip
dan.k.memes vs anuraganurag (60%)dan.k.memescoinflip
sumin vs GidTheKid2GidTheKid2 (60%)sumincoinflip
xpoes vs anuraganurag (59%)xpoescoinflip
Say "The market's so-called biggest upsets? Every one was a 60-40 line that went the other way. When your 'shocker' was priced at 60%, it wasn't a shocker โ€” the line was just soft."
SEGMENT 4 ยท SHARP MONEY IS REAL

The early bets beat the line 69%

Here's the twist that saves the bettors' honor. Take the sharp cohort โ€” the top forecasters by Brier โ€” and look only at positions placed more than 6 hours before tip, so there's zero live leakage. Those early bets sided with the eventual winner in 69% of 49 game markets. And when the sharps split from the pregame favorite, they were right 69% of the time. COLOR (small cohort, early-bet subset)

Sayโญ "The crowd is a coin flip. The sharps are not. Bets placed six-plus hours early, by our best forecasters, beat the market line 69 to 50. The edge exists โ€” it's just concentrated in a handful of people."

The cleanest example โ€” dan.k.memes vs anurag

The pregame market favored anurag at 60%. The sharps loaded the other side โ€” dan.k.memes โ€” early. Dan.k.memes won, and by lock the market had swung all the way to 99.6% on him. The smart money was on it before the room caught up. COLOR

Say "In dan.k.memes versus anurag, the room had anurag at 60%. The sharps quietly backed dan.k.memes hours early โ€” and he won. That's what an edge looks like: right, and early."
SEGMENT 5 ยท STEAM

The biggest movers of the season

Where the price ran the furthest from open to last trade. All-star markets dominate โ€” the ballot narrative moved hard as the season revealed who was real. SOLID (direction), note exact open %

MarketOpen โ†’ LastMoveTrades
Theenash S โ€” all-star?13% โ†’ 95%+8262
Edwin H โ€” all-star?75% โ†’ 7%โˆ’6824
Edward C โ€” all-star?4% โ†’ 71%+6752
Any team finish 6-0?70% โ†’ 5%โˆ’6455
Roshan A โ€” all-star?30% โ†’ 92%+6218
Lucas W โ€” all-star?23% โ†’ 85%+6226
Any team finish 0-6?70% โ†’ 10%โˆ’6062
Eric L โ€” all-star?11% โ†’ 63%+5338
Sayโญ "The single biggest move of the season: Theenash S making an all-star team ran from 13% all the way to 95%. Nobody believed in him in Week 1, and the market spent five weeks admitting it was wrong."

Method note: the "open %" is the first recorded trade, not always a genuine opening price โ€” the raw opening field is sparse. Directions and magnitudes are trustworthy; treat the exact endpoints as soft.


Caveats & method: Small pool โ€” 24 qualifying human traders, Weeks 1โ€“5, 68 resolved markets. Treat any single-game "call" as color, not proof. The market is an LMSR AMM (no order book, no bid/ask); "volume" = ฮฃ|cost| and CLV is undefined because markets resolve to the truth. Bot/strategy accounts (Bayes, Galton, Kelly, Pascal, Treasury, Tversky, results-bot) are excluded. Human alt-accounts (dannyridel/dannyridel4, blue water/bluewater16, Varnite/varnite) are flagged but not de-duplicated, so net-worth ranks and cohort math could shift if merged. The sharpest-bettor crown foregrounds the volume-backed forecaster (dannyridel, 44 markets) over the flashier thin-book Brier (a new rag, 19 markets). Per-stat confidence lives in outputs/podcast/AUDIT.md.