Read as:๐Ÿ“š Science Bowl๐Ÿ€ NBA๐Ÿˆ NFL๐Ÿ’น Quantโšฝ Soccerโšพ Baseball๐ŸŽฌ Game Centers๐Ÿงฎ Playoff Picture๐Ÿ‘‘ Category Kingsโญ Player Ratings๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Team Coverage
THE TAPE ยท WEEK 3 CLOSE ยท MARK-TO-MARKET ยท with alpha-vs-benchmark analytics

Week 3: The Contenders Blew Up

Three of the top four books got carried out โ€” two on limit-down sessions โ€” one desk closed the day negative, and Kian D printed $44M solo.

Week 2 was mean reversion; Week 3 was a regime break. ChessFun, czz, and sumin โ€” three of the four richest books on the Street โ€” all lost, two of them by sixty-plus. This close we're marking every desk against its benchmark โ€” the expected P&L and winning tickets a book should have booked given exactly who sat the desk and how strong each asset class was. It turns the blowups into an attribution: some shops smashed their number, others cratered miles below it. The two factors that keep driving returns in this league were the same two again โ€” who showed up on the desk and who kept the risk limits.

๐Ÿ“ˆ Three things the headline P&L hides:
โ€ข Blow-ups owned both tails. (Stitch)ยฒ blew up TEN times โ€” a โˆ’$40M self-inflicted drawdown โ€” and marked the close at โˆ’$14M, a book that literally went negative. At the other pole, jonathan booked a winning session despite SEVEN blow-ups. Risk discipline defined both tails of the week.
โ€ข Headcount hit the contenders. ChessFun's Eric L โ€” Week 1's lowest-latency PM โ€” booked zero tickets (off the desk), and ChessFun got upset. xpoes again ran without Rohan G. The biggest marks keep tracking the seating chart.
โ€ข Alpha exposed the frauds and the flukes. The scoreboard says +$164M; the benchmark model says Connor ran +6.1 tickets over expectation โ€” real alpha, not noise. Meanwhile czz (โˆ’3.0) and (Stitch)ยฒ (โˆ’4.2) didn't just lose, they printed well under what their own desk should have produced.

Alpha vs Benchmark โ€” expected P&L (actual tickets vs expected)

For every desk we simulate the winning tickets it should have booked given the exact PMs who dressed and each side's asset-class strength, then mark it against what it actually printed. Positive = alpha (booked more tickets than the matchup implied); negative = negative alpha. It's the cleanest "was it real?" filter on a wild close.

DeskActual ticketsExpected (bench)Alpha (ฮ”)The mark
Connor Chang169.9+6.1Kian D's 11-for-11 dragged the whole book miles past its number. Utterly real alpha.
cryo129.1+2.9The $60M limit-down on czz was earned โ€” cryo beat its benchmark across every desk.
dan.k.memes129.6+2.4Won the volume battle by more than the matchup implied. 3โ€“0 is no fluke.
anurag119.0+2.0Finally monetized the talent โ€” genuine alpha, not just sumin fading.
jonathan108.6+1.4The upset had substance โ€” out-booked its benchmark even with 7 blow-ups.
xpoes97.8+1.2A PM short and STILL beat its number. Imagine this book with a full desk.
GidTheKid2109.6+0.4Right on benchmark; the win came from an 80% capture night, not extra tickets.
Fez_Keyreb77.7โˆ’0.7Roughly par on coverage; the loss was blow-ups and ticket volume, not sourcing.
ChessFun88.9โˆ’0.9Slightly under par โ€” and that's WITH Eric L off the desk lowering the bar. Headcount cost them.
sumin78.8โˆ’1.8Negative alpha and lost the unbeaten tag. anurag's Credit sweep did real damage.
czz69.0โˆ’3.0The $60M loss wasn't variance โ€” czz printed 3 tickets below its own floor.
(Stitch)ยฒ48.2โˆ’4.2The โˆ’$14M was a total-system failure: 4 tickets on an 8-ticket desk, plus ten blow-ups.

The Sessions

the Street had it at Connor Chang โˆ’11 โœ“
Connor Chang $150M โ€” โˆ’$14M (Stitch)ยฒ
Driver: a Kian D masterclass vs a risk-limit meltdown

The tape of the season, in both directions. Kian D went 11-for-11 for $44M with zero blow-ups โ€” the best single session anyone has printed โ€” and he didn't do it in a vacuum: Connor swept Commodities 4โ€“0 (against a benchmark of just 2.0 there) and took Equities, Credit and Derivatives 3โ€“1. As a book Connor printed 16 winning tickets against an expected 9.9, a +6.1 alpha run that is the largest of the week and removes any doubt this was a scheduling fluke. This is monetization on top of sourcing on top of a star PM having the session of his life.

(Stitch)ยฒ was the mirror image โ€” a total-system failure and a book that finished underwater. They managed just 4 tickets on a desk worth ~8 (โˆ’4.2), then blew up ten times for a โˆ’$40M self-inflicted drawdown that turned a bad close into a historic one: final mark โˆ’$14M. pancreas uvula alone accounted for 5 of the ten blow-ups. When you hand back forty million on interrupts, the asset-class battle is almost beside the point โ€” the risk desk lost the session before the sourcing desk ever got a vote. Lean in: this is what a negative book looks like.

ALPHA Connor 16 vs 9.9 (+6.1) ยท Stitch 4 vs 8.2 (โˆ’4.2)
vs bench by desk Connor: CMD 4 vs 2.0, DERIV 3 vs 1.7 ยท Stitch: SYS 0 vs 1.4, CMD 0 vs 1.3
capture 56% (9/16) ยท 25% (1/4)   blow-ups Connor 1 ยท Stitch 10 (โˆ’$40M)   latency word 23 ยท 28   no-bid 3/23
the Street had it at czz โˆ’5 โœ—
cryo $110M โ€” $50M czz
Driver: a Credit sweep and a latency gap

The West statement of the close, and the alpha says it was fully deserved: cryo booked 12 vs 9.1 expected (+2.9) while czz cratered to 6 vs 9.0 (โˆ’3.0) โ€” a six-ticket swing that is the entire $60M margin. The engine room was Credit, where cryo went 4โ€“0 against a 1.8 benchmark (+2.2), the single most dominant asset-class print of the round. When one desk owns a whole book of the tape, the margin takes care of itself.

cryo also owned the clock, executing at an average of word 20 to czz's 34 โ€” lower latency to the bid on nearly every look. czz never found a second PM behind vishnu m (4 tickets); the supporting desk printed just $20M combined. A title contender looked ordinary, and the model agrees it wasn't bad luck โ€” it was negative alpha on a one-PM book.

ALPHA cryo 12 vs 9.1 (+2.9) ยท czz 6 vs 9.0 (โˆ’3.0)
vs bench by desk cryo: CR 4 vs 1.8, CMD 3 vs 1.7 ยท czz: CR 0 vs 1.3
capture 58% (7/12) ยท 50% (3/6)   blow-ups cryo 2 ยท czz 1   latency word 20 ยท 34   no-bid 5/23
the Street had it at ChessFun โˆ’11 โœ—
jonathan $72M โ€” $54M ChessFun
Driver: a key-man who never sat the desk

The upset of the week is really a headcount story. ChessFun's Eric L โ€” its lowest-latency, most productive PM โ€” booked zero tickets (off the desk), and the top-heavy book never recovered. Even with the bar already lowered by his absence, ChessFun still marked below par (8 vs 8.9, โˆ’0.9) โ€” there was no next man up on the bench.

jonathan pounced, and it wasn't a smash-and-grab: they ran alpha at 10 vs 8.6 (+1.4), powered by a Credit 3โ€“1 edge (3 vs 1.5 expected) and a Derivatives 2โ€“0 sweep. The wart is risk discipline โ€” seven blow-ups โ€” the only reason this was $18M and not $30M. Clean up the interrupts and the Week-2 giant-killer is a genuine problem; a 60% capture night to ChessFun's 38% shows the sourcing is there.

ALPHA jonathan 10 vs 8.6 (+1.4) ยท ChessFun 8 vs 8.9 (โˆ’0.9)
vs bench by desk jonathan: CR 3 vs 1.5, DERIV 2 vs 1.2 ยท ChessFun: DERIV 0 vs 1.3
capture 60% (6/10) ยท 38% (3/8)   blow-ups jonathan 7 (โˆ’$28M) ยท ChessFun 2   latency word 22 ยท 23   no-bid 5/23
note: Eric L (ChessFun) booked zero tickets โ€” treated as off the desk.
the Street had it at sumin โˆ’3 โœ—
anurag $96M โ€” $66M sumin
Driver: a Credit sweep, and sumin's first losing session

sumin's unbeaten aura ended hard, and the alpha says it was more anurag rising than sumin collapsing โ€” anurag ran +2.0 (11 vs 9.0) while sumin came in modestly under (7 vs 8.8, โˆ’1.8). The decisive book was Credit: anurag went 4โ€“0 against a 1.6 benchmark (+2.4), the biggest single-desk overperformance of the session. This is the anurag book finally monetizing the talent it out-sourced with in Week 1.

sumin's one bright spot was a Derivatives sweep (3โ€“0, +1.8 over bench), but they got shut out in Commodities (0 vs 1.6) and never threatened anurag's coverage anywhere else. Sanjay O (4 tickets, low latency at word 19) ran the anurag desk. After an 0โ€“2 open built on fixable back-office mistakes, anurag turned the corner and took the East's last unbeaten book down with it.

ALPHA anurag 11 vs 9.0 (+2.0) ยท sumin 7 vs 8.8 (โˆ’1.8)
vs bench by desk anurag: CR 4 vs 1.6 ยท sumin: DERIV 3 vs 1.2, CMD 0 vs 1.6
capture 55% (6/11) ยท 71% (5/7)   blow-ups anurag 2 ยท sumin 3   latency word 23 ยท 28   no-bid 5/23
the Street had it at GidTheKid2 โˆ’15 โœ“
GidTheKid2 $100M โ€” $78M xpoes
Driver: an 80% capture night vs a thin bench

The most interesting alpha line of the week: both books ran positive. Gid landed right on its number on tickets (10 vs 9.6) and won on the capture line instead โ€” an elite 80% monetization (8/10) โ€” plus Credit and Derivatives 3โ€“1 edges. This was a win built on cashing what they sourced, not on extra volume.

The story underneath is xpoes: 9 tickets against a 7.8 benchmark (+1.2) while a PM short (no Rohan G, again). Jianyu was the session's second-best PM (5 tickets) and they swept Equities 3โ€“0 (+2.1 over bench) โ€” a genuinely strong print from a thin book. Whole, this xpoes desk beats its number by more and maybe wins the session; short, it ran out of coverage in Rates (0 vs 1.3) and couldn't match Gid's back office.

ALPHA Gid 10 vs 9.6 (+0.4) ยท xpoes 9 vs 7.8 (+1.2)
vs bench by desk Gid: DERIV 3 vs 2.1, CR 3 vs 1.6 ยท xpoes: EQ 3 vs 0.9, RATES 0 vs 1.3
capture 80% (8/10) ยท 56% (5/9)   blow-ups Gid 5 ยท xpoes 2   latency word 28 ยท 26   no-bid 4/23
note: xpoes ran without Rohan G โ€” benchmark already reflects the short desk.
the Street had it at dan.k.memes โˆ’7 โœ“
dan.k.memes $98M โ€” $62M Fez_Keyreb
Driver: volume over monetization

The cleanest "capture isn't everything" session of the year. Fez_Keyreb cashed 71% of bonuses to dan's 42% โ€” and lost by $36M, because dan simply booked far more tickets: 12 vs 9.6 expected (+2.4) to Fez's par-ish 7 vs 7.7 (โˆ’0.7). You can't monetize deals you never source.

dan did it with sweeps โ€” Systematic 3โ€“0 and Commodities 4โ€“0 (+2.3 over bench there) โ€” and, crucially, a clean sheet on risk limits (0 blow-ups) while Fez gave four back. varnite (5 tickets) paced a balanced book with no weak desk. dan.k.memes is a spotless 3โ€“0, and the benchmark calls it the most consistent shop in the league โ€” it beats its number every session without ever looking spectacular. The disciplined compounder.

ALPHA dan 12 vs 9.6 (+2.4) ยท Fez 7 vs 7.7 (โˆ’0.7)
vs bench by desk dan: CMD 4 vs 1.7, SYS 3 vs 1.6 ยท Fez: SYS 0 vs 1.4, CMD 0 vs 1.2
capture 42% (5/12) ยท 71% (5/7)   blow-ups dan 0 ยท Fez 4   latency word 26 ยท 24   no-bid 4/23

League Table

All 14 books marked to market after Week 3, both desks. Records first, but the marks lean on alpha โ€” who's really as good as their P&L.

EAST

#BookThe Mark
1dan.k.memes3โ€“0 and beats its benchmark every session (+2.4). Wins on volume and sweeps, not capture (42%). The standard.
2GidTheKid22โ€“1 with Harry Gao back on the desk and an 80% capture night. Right on benchmark; the ceiling is the draft-day book.
3mingle/YunyiDark this week, 1โ€“1, still owns the $130M single-session high. Untested since the capture fix โ€” reopens next week.
4sumin1โ€“1. Ran negative alpha (โˆ’1.8) losing the unbeaten tag. Still holds that $138M, but the Credit hole is real.
5anurag1โ€“2, but the eye test and the alpha agree the book is rising (+2.0). A $30M win that ended sumin's run.
6xpoes1โ€“2, and the most unlucky book on the Street โ€” beats its number (+1.2) every session while a PM short.
7Fez_Keyreb0โ€“2. Par on coverage, but blow-ups and low ticket volume keep sinking a strong capture stroke.

WEST

#BookThe Mark
1cryo2โ€“1 and the hottest book on the Street โ€” +2.9 alpha, a $60M limit-down of a contender at blazing latency.
2ChessFun2โ€“1, beat cryo head-to-head โ€” but got upset and marked below par with Eric L off the desk. The headcount watch is everything.
3czz2โ€“1, but โˆ’3.0 in a $60M loss โ€” not variance, a genuine no-bid session behind vishnu m. Too much single-PM concentration.
4jonathan1โ€“1 and felled the giant with substance (+1.4). Fix the 7 blow-ups and this spoiler book is dangerous.
5James WDark this week, 1โ€“1. The preseason A+ still finding its level; a real test at ChessFun awaits.
6Connor Chang1โ€“2, but +6.1 alpha and Kian D's $44M say the record is a lie. Both losses were to the West's best books.
7(Stitch)ยฒ0โ€“2 off a โˆ’$14M (โˆ’4.2 alpha, ten blow-ups). The talent isn't the problem; the risk desk is a five-alarm fire.

The Street

The chalk went 5โ€“1 in Week 2; Week 3 shredded it again. Three favored contenders โ€” czz, sumin, and ChessFun โ€” all lost, and the alpha ledger backs the carnage: czz (โˆ’3.0) and sumin (โˆ’1.8) genuinely ran negative, while the shorts that beat them (cryo +2.9, anurag +2.0, jonathan +1.4) all cleared their benchmark. The tape that faded the crowded long paid: cryo (a home dog by our number) won by $60M, and jonathan flipped an 11-point deficit into an $18M win. Reputation is worth less here than headcount and risk discipline on the night โ€” and now we can mark exactly how much less. The Street never repriced ahead of the print; odds barely drifted toward the dogs intraday and only gapped once the P&L locked.

Traders of the Week

๐Ÿ† Top PM: Kian D (Connor Chang) โ€” $44M on 11 winning tickets, zero blow-ups, the best single-session line of the year, and the engine of the league's biggest book alpha (+6.1). Not close.
PMDeskP&LTicketsBlow-upsAvg latency
Kian DConnor Chang$44M11021
Jianyuxpoes$20M5120
varnitedan.k.memes$20M5020
Sanjay Oanurag$16M4019
suzukocryo$16M4116
Harry GaoGidTheKid2$16M4131

โšก Lowest latency: suzuko (word 16) and anurag's Sanjay O (19) set the pace to the bid. Risk-limit trouble: pancreas uvula ((Stitch)ยฒ, 5 blow-ups) headlined the ten-blow-up implosion; Abhinav (Gid) had 3 and Chris W (Fez) had 2 in a losing seat.

The Week Ahead

Week 4 puts the two hottest storylines on the marquee and sits Connor Chang and anurag dark. The questions into the open: can anyone catch dan.k.memes (3โ€“0) in the East, and is Eric L back on the ChessFun desk?

โญ Trade of the Week
mingle/Yunyi @ dan.k.memes

The East's unbeaten book meets its scariest ceiling. dan.k.memes (3โ€“0) wins the quiet way โ€” volume, sweeps, zero blow-ups, +2.4 alpha โ€” while mingle/Yunyi, reopening after a dark week, owns the league's single-session high ($130M) and a fixed capture stroke. dan's relentless coverage against mingle's top-end firepower; win it and you're the clear class of the conference.

James W @ ChessFun
watch: the key-man report

ChessFun's ceiling rides on headcount. With Eric L back on the desk this is a top-two West book; without him, jonathan just published the blueprint and the alpha (โˆ’0.9 even at a lowered bar) says there's no next man up. A rested, diversified James W is exactly the kind of book that punishes a short-handed favorite.

cryo @ (Stitch)ยฒ  ยท  czz @ jonathan
watch: bounce-backs & giant-killers

Two redemption tapes. The hottest book on the Street, cryo, visits (Stitch)ยฒ โ€” can a โˆ’4.2, ten-blow-up desk stabilize its risk in a week? And czz, freshly humbled by $60M and 3 tickets below its floor, draws the giant-killer jonathan โ€” a nasty landing spot to prove the blowup was a blip, not a level-set.

๐Ÿ”ฎ Dark next week
Connor Chang  ยท  anurag

Both sit out Week 4. Connor's +6.1 alpha and Kian D's $44M mean the 1โ€“2 record badly understates the book โ€” this is a top-half desk marking time. anurag exits on a rising note (+2.0, ended sumin's unbeaten run); the momentum has to survive a week in cold storage.

๐Ÿ‘€ On the tape:  โ€ข Eric L โ€” his status swings ChessFun's season.  โ€ข Rohan G โ€” xpoes keeps running alpha a PM short; do they get the desk whole?  โ€ข The blow-up count โ€” (Stitch)ยฒ's ten and jonathan's seven say risk discipline is still random.  โ€ข dan.k.memes at 3โ€“0 โ€” the East's book to beat, hosting its toughest counterparty.